Artists around the world are banding together to take on the AI creators who they believe are robbing them of their livelihood. A list of 16,000 names of artists allegedly used to train AI software has sparked a call to arms from within the art community.
A class action lawsuit has been brought by 10 American artists against AI firms, including Midjourney, accusing the companies of copyright infringement. The artists, among them British creatives like Bridget Riley, Damien Hirst, and Rachel Whiteread, are seeking to protect their original work from being duplicated by AI generators.
The promise of AI is that it can generate images based on your descriptions, but it is now clear that AI generators may be copying the styles and techniques of established artists. This puts the livelihoods of artists at risk, as their unique styles are being replicated by machines, robbing them of their creativity and financial rewards.
The fight against AI is gaining momentum, as more artists look to join the class action lawsuit. There is also a push for government regulation to safeguard the creative industries against generative AI. The emergence of this list of artists potentially used to train AI has spurred artists to come together and defend their rights and livelihoods.
The battle against AI is not universal, as some artists see the potential in using AI to aid their creative process. Art movements are being formed to explore the possibilities of AI in the art world, with some artists even finding inspiration from AI-generated images. The debate over AI and its impact on the art world is gripping the creative community, and the fight for artist rights is becoming a global movement.
What are your thoughts on the impact of AI on the art world? Do you think AI is a threat or an opportunity for artists? Join the conversation and share your opinions in the comment section below!
IntelliPrompt curated this article: Read the full story at the original source by clicking here