Rewrite article as a blog post and keep HTML tags with only 6-8 paragraphs. Summarize the article and remember to include the main points in a concise manner. You are an expert Artificial Intelligence journalist. Use sophisticated, nuanced, and well-crafted writing language that appeals to well-educated readers. Avoid exaggerated or overstated terms but stay within the facts of the article.
Provide insightful analysis, thoughtful commentary, and unique perspectives that go beyond simply summarizing the article.
Focus on maintaining the integrity of the original article’s content while presenting it in a way that engages the highbrow reader’s intellect and curiosity.
Use a tone that is appropriate for the specific topic and the highbrow audience, which may range from intellectual and analytical to thought-provoking and reflective.
Include H2 subheadings within the blog post and do NOT use ‘**’ in the headline or the subheadings (H2) or anywhere in the blog post.
Do NOT use asterisk or asterisks before or after headlines or subheadings. Do not number the subheadings or prefix them with anything. Add a hard return after the H2 and make the H2 subheadings Bold.
Finally, write a 80 word ‘Conclusion’, from your perspective on the article as an LLM using a scholarly style of writing. Do not describe yourself as an LLM but rather write from that perspective.:Abashidze AKH, Inshakova AO, Dementev AA (2021) New challenges of international law in the digital age. In: Popkova EG, Sergi BS (eds) Modern global economic system: evolutional development vs. revolutionary leap. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1125–1132Chapter
Google Scholar
Abulibdeh A, Zaidan E, Abulibdeh R (2024) Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140527AI Advisory Body (2023) Interim report: Governing AI for humanity. https://www.un.org/techenvoy/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/ai_advisory_body_interim_report.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2024Ala-Pietilä P, Smuha NA (2021) A framework for global cooperation on artificial intelligence and its governance. In Reflections on artificial intelligence for humanity. Springer, DordrechtAlalawi Z et al. (2024) Trust AI regulation? Discerning users are vital to build trust and effective AI regulation. Artificial Intelligence. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.09510Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence and the Law (2019) The Sir Henry Brooke Lecture for BAILII Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, London; Lord Sales, Justice of the UK Supreme Court 12 November 2019Alhosani K, Alhashmi SM (2024) Opportunities, challenges, and benefits of AI innovation in government services: A review. Discov Artif Intell 4(8):1–19ADS
Google Scholar
Anthony A, Sharma L, Noor E (2024) Advancing a more global agenda for trustworthy artificial intelligence. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/04/advancing-a-more-global-agenda-for-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence?lang=en. Accessed 20 November 2024Alschner W (2021) The computational analysis of international law. In: Deplano R, Tsagourias N (eds) Research methods in international law: a handbook. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 203–227
Google Scholar
Al Shebli K et al. (2021) RTA’s employees perceptions toward the efficiency of artificial intelligence and big data utilization in providing smart services to the residents of Dubai. In: Hassanien AE, et al., (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence and computer vision. Springer, Dordrecht
Google Scholar
Anderljung M et al. (2023) Frontier AI regulation: managing emerging risks to public safety. Cornell UniversityAndrés MB (2021) Towards legal regulation of artificial intelligence. Rev IUS 15:35–53. https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v15i48.2021.661Article
Google Scholar
Alvarez JE (2006) International organizations as law-makers. Oxford University Press, OxfordBook
Google Scholar
Alzou’bi S, Alshibly H, Al-Ma’aitah (2014) Artificial intelligence in law enforcement, a review. IJAIT 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijait.2014.4401Article
Google Scholar
Akkus B (2023) An assessment of the acceptance of meaningful human control as a norm of international law in armed conflicts using artificial intelligence. J Ank Bar Assoc 81:49–102. https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1143722Article
Google Scholar
Anastassov A (2021) Artificial intelligence and its possible use in international nuclear security law. Papers of BAS. Hum Soc Sci 8:92–103
Google Scholar
Anzini M (2021) The artificial intelligence act proposal and its implications for member states. European Institute of Public Administration. https://www.eipa.eu/publications/briefing/the-artificial-intelligence-act-proposal-and-its-implications-for-member-states/. Accessed 20 November 2024Armstrong S, Bostrom N, Shulman C (2016) Racing to the precipice: a model of artificial intelligence development. AI Soc 31:201–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0590-yArticle
Google Scholar
Arvidsson M, Noll G (2023) Artificial intelligence, decision making and international law. Nord J Int Law 92:1–8Article
Google Scholar
Baig A (2024) An overview of emerging global AI regulations. Accessed 20 November 2024Bartneck C, Yogeeswaran K, Sibley CG (2023) Personality and demographic correlates of support for regulating artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00279-4Bench-Capon T et al. (2012) A history of AI and law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and law. Artif Intell Law 20:215–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9131-xArticle
Google Scholar
Bennett M (2023) AI regulation: What businesses need to know. TechTarget. https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/feature/AI-regulation-What-businesses-need-to-know. Accessed 20 November 2024Bensousan A (2020) How to legally regulate artificial intelligence? Ann Mines 12:1–3
Google Scholar
Benvenisti E (2018) Upholding democracy amid the challenges of new technology: What role for the law of global governance? EJIL 29:9–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy013Article
Google Scholar
Besson S (2016) State consent and disagreement in international law-making. Dissolving the paradox. LJIL 29:289–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156516000030Article
Google Scholar
Bex F, Prakken H, Van Engers T, Bart V (2017) Introduction to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice (AI4J). Artif Intell Law 25:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9198-5Article
Google Scholar
Black J, Murry AD (2019) Regulating AI and machine learning: Setting the regulatory agenda. EJLT 10:1–21
Google Scholar
Blodgett-Ford SJ (2018) Future privacy: a real right to privacy for artificial intelligence. In Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 307–352Bodansky D, Watson JS (1992) State consent and the sources of international obligation. Proceedings of the annual meeting. 86:108–113. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25658621Boon K (2014) Are control tests fit for the future? The slippage problem in attribution doctrines. MJIL 15:1–46
Google Scholar
Borlini L (2023) Economic interventionism and international trade law in the covid era. GLJ 24:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.13Article
Google Scholar
Boutin B (2022) State responsibility in relation to military applications of artificial intelligence. LJIL 36:133–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156522000607Article
Google Scholar
Bova P, Di Stefano A, Han TH (2023) Both eyes open: Vigilant incentives help regulatory markets improve AI safety. Artif Intell. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03174Brewster R (2009) Unpacking the state’s reputation. Harv Int’l L J 50:231–269
Google Scholar
Broadbent M (2021) What’s ahead for a cooperative regulatory agenda on artificial intelligence? Center for Strategic & International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/whats-ahead-cooperative-regulatory-agenda-artificial-intelligence#:~:text=The%20Commission%20hopes%20that%20the,in%20which%20AI%20is%20adopted. Accessed 20 November 2024Brown P, Tarca A (2005) A commentary on issues relating to the enforcement of International Financial Reporting Standards in the EU. Eur Acc Rev 14:181–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000338997Article
Google Scholar
Buhmann A, Fieseler C (2021) Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence. Technol Soc J 64:101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475Article
Google Scholar
Buiten MC (2019) Towards intelligent regulation of artificial intelligence. Eur J Risk Regul 10(1):41–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2019.8Article
Google Scholar
Buiten M, de Streel A, Peitz M (2023) The law and economics of AI liability. Comput Law Secur Rev 48:105794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105794Article
Google Scholar
Burchardt D (2023a) Editorial to the special issue “the impact of digitalization on international law”. GLJ 24:435–437. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.32Article
Google Scholar
Burchardt D (2023b) Does digitalization change international law structurally? GLJ 24:438–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.31Article
Google Scholar
Burri T (2018) International law and artificial intelligence. GYIL 60:91–108. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.60.1.91Article
Google Scholar
Busuioc M (2022) AI algorithmic oversight: New frontier in regulation. In: Maggetti M, Di Mascio F, Natalini A (eds) Handbook of regulatory authorities. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Google Scholar
Butcher JG, Beridze I (2019) What is the state of artificial intelligence governance globally? RUSI 164:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1694260Article
Google Scholar
Butler J (2020) The corporate keepers of international law. AJIL 114:189–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.1Article
Google Scholar
Buthe T et al. (2022) Governing AI—attempting to herd cats? Introduction to the special issue on the governance of artificial intelligence. J Eur Public Policy 29:1721–1752. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2126515Article
Google Scholar
Calo R (2017) Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. UC Davis Law Rev 51:399–435
Google Scholar
Carrillo MR (2020) Artificial intelligence: from ethics to law. Telecom Policy 44:101937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101937Article
Google Scholar
Castel JG, Castel ME (2016) The road to artificial super-intelligence: has international law a role to play? CJLT 14:1–15
Google Scholar
Cath C (2018a) Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc A 376:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0080Article
Google Scholar
Cath C et al. (2018b) Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Sci Eng Ethics 24:505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Čerka P, Grigienė J, Sirbikytė G (2015) Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence. Comput Law Secur Rev 31:376–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.03.008Article
Google Scholar
Cha S (2024) Towards an international regulatory framework for AI safety: lessons from the IAEA’s nuclear safety regulations. HSSC 11:1–13
Google Scholar
Chache EG, Dremlyuga RI, Tret’yakova NA, Neznamov AV (2023) System approach to the study of state policies and formation of ethics of application of artificial intelligence technologies: global atlas of regulation. Dokl Math 106:S65–S69. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562422060059Article
Google Scholar
Chatterjee S, Khorana S, Kizgin H (2022) Harnessing the potential of artificial intelligence to foster citizens satisfaction: an empirical study on India. Gov Inf Q 39:101621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101621Article
Google Scholar
Celeste E et al. (2023) The content governance dilemma: digital constitutionalism, social media and the search for a global standard. Springer, DordrechtBook
Google Scholar
Cheng J, Zeng J (2023) Shaping AI’s future? J Contemp China 32:794–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2107391Article
ADS
Google Scholar
Chesterman S (2020) Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality. ICLQ 69:819–844. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589320000366Article
Google Scholar
Chesterman S (2021a) Weapons of mass disruption: artificial intelligence and international law. CILJ 10:181–203. https://doi.org/10.4337/cilj.2021.02.02Article
Google Scholar
Chesterman S (2021b) We, the robots? Regulating artificial intelligence and the limits of the law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeBook
Google Scholar
Chinen M (2023) The international governance of artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamBook
Google Scholar
Chinkin C, Kaldor M (2017) International law and new wars. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeBook
Google Scholar
Chou D (2023) AI companies aren’t afraid of regulation—we want it to be international and inclusive. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/aug/04/ai-companies-regulation-international-inclusive. Accessed 20 November 2024Cihon P (2019) Standards for AI governance: International standards to enable global coordination in AI research & development. Future of Humanity Institute, University of OxfordCihon P, Maas MM, Kemp L (2020a) Should artificial intelligence governance be centralised? Design lessons from history. AIES. 228–234. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.03573Cihon P, Maas MM, Kemp L (2020b) Fragmentation and the future: Investigating architectures for international AI governance. Glob Policy 11:545556. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12890Article
Google Scholar
Clark J, Hadfield GK (2019a) Regulatory markets for AI safety. Comput Soc. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.00078Cogan JK (2011) The regulatory turn in international law. Harv Int’l L J 52:321–372
Google Scholar
Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) (2021) Ad hoc Committee. https://rm.coe.int/terms-of-reference-of-the-committee-on-artificial-intelligence-for-202/1680a74d2f. Accessed 20 November 2024Committee on Legal Affairs (2021) Report on artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0001_EN.html. Accessed 20 November 2024Council of Europe (2024) Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of LawCyberspace Administration of China (2023a) 国家互联网信息办公室等三部门发布《互联网信息服务深度合成管理规定》 (Deep Synthesis Provisions). https://www.cac.gov.cn/2022-12/11/c_1672221949318230.htm. Accessed 20 November 2024Creemer R, Webster G, Toner H (2022) Translation: Internet Information Service Algorithmic Recommendation Management Provisions—Effective March 1, 2022. https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/translation-internet-information-service-algorithmic-recommendation-management-provisions-effective-march-1-2022/. Accessed 20 November 2024Cyberspace Administration of China (2023b) 生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (Interim Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Service Management). https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm. Accessed 20 November 2024Dauvergne P (2021) The globalization of artificial intelligence: consequences for the politics of environmentalism. Globalizations 18:285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1785670Article
Google Scholar
De Almeida PGR, Dos Santos CD, Farias JS (2020) Artificial intelligence regulation: a meta-framework for formulation and governance. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii international conference on system sciencesDe Almeida PGR, Dos Santos CD, Farias JS (2021) Artificial intelligence regulation: a framework for governance. Ethics Inf Technol 23:505–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09593-zArticle
Google Scholar
Deeks A (2020a) High-tech international law. Geo Wash L Rev 88:574–653
Google Scholar
Deeks A (2020b) Introduction to the symposium: How will artificial intelligence affect international law? AJIL 114:138–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2020.29Article
Google Scholar
Dellapenna JW (2000) Law in a shrinking world: The interaction of science and technology with international law. Ky L J 88:809–883
Google Scholar
Diamond J (2023) Leading AI companies commit to outside testing of AI systems and other safety commitments. CNN Politics. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/21/politics/white-house-artificial-intelligence/index.html. Accessed 20 November 2024Diaz-Rodriguez N et al. (2023) Connecting the dots in trustworthy artificial intelligence: from AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Inf Fusion 99:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896Article
Google Scholar
DiMatteo LA, Poncibò C, Cannarsa M (2022) The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence: global perspectives on law and ethics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeBook
Google Scholar
Djeffal C, Siewert MB, Wurster S (2022) Role of the state and responsibility in governing artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of AI strategies. J Eur Public Policy 29:1799–1821. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2094987Article
Google Scholar
Dremliuga RI et al. (2019) Artificial intelligence as a subject of law: pros and cons. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación. Política Valores 7:1–16
Google Scholar
DoCarmo T et al. (2021) The law in computation: What machine learning, artificial intelligence, and big data mean for law and society scholarship. Law Policy 43:170–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12164Article
Google Scholar
Du M (2023) Policy regulation of artificial intelligence: a review of the literature. In: Tallón-Ballesteros AJ, Santana-Morales P (eds) Digitalization and management innovation. IOS Press, Amsterdam, p 407–415
Google Scholar
Dulka A (2023) The use of artificial intelligence in international human rights law. Stan Tech L Rev 26:316–366.
Google Scholar
Dung PM, Sartor G (2011) The modular logic of private international law. Artif Intell Law 19:233–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-011-9112-5Article
Google Scholar
Ellul J et al. (2021) A pragmatic approach to regulating artificial intelligence: A technology regulator’s perspectiveEmery-Xu N, Park A, Trager R (2023) Uncertainty, information, and risk in international technological races. J Confl Resol. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027231214996Erdélyi OJ, Goldsmith J (2018) Regulating artificial intelligence proposal for a global solution. 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ’18), February 2–3, 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA
Google Scholar
Erdélyi OJ, Goldsmith J (2022) Regulating artificial intelligence proposal for a global solution. Gov Inf Q 39:101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101748Article
Google Scholar
Erman E, Furendal M (2022a) Artificial intelligence and the political legitimacy of global governance. Polit Stud 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221126665Erman E, Furendal M (2022b) The global governance of artificial intelligence: some normative concerns. MOPP 9:267–291. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2020-0046Article
Google Scholar
EU AI Act (2024) European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts (COM(2021)0206 – C9-0146/2021 – 2021/0106(COD))Fay R (2019) Digital platforms require a global governance framework. Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/digital-platforms-require-global-governance-framework/. Accessed 20 November 2024Feijoo C et al. (2020) Harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) to increase wellbeing for all: the case for a new technology diplomacy. Telecom Policy 44:101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101988Article
Google Scholar
Engler A (2023) Key enforcement issues of the AI Act should lead EU trilogue debate. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/key-enforcement-issues-of-the-ai-act-should-lead-eu-trilogue-debate/. Accessed 20 November 2024Finocchiaro G (2023) The regulation of artificial intelligence. AI & Society. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01650-zFollesdal A (2022) The significance of state consent for the legitimate authority of customary international law. In: Merkouris P, Kammerhofer J, Arajärvi N (eds) The theory, practice, and interpretation of customary international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar
Fournier-Tombs E (2021) Towards a United Nations internal regulation for artificial intelligence. Big Data Soc. 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211039493Franzie B (2018) Does international law change state behavior? Submitted in partial completion of the requirements for departmental honors in political science. Bridgewater State UniversityFurendal M (2023) Non-state actors and the global governance of artificial intelligence. ECPR. https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/69246. Accessed 20 November 2024Gabriel I (2020) Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment. Minds Mach 30:411–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2Article
Google Scholar
Galceran-Vercher M (2023) Artificial intelligence and cities: the global race to regulate algorithms. CIBOD 50. https://www.cidob.org/en/publications/publication_series/notes_internacionals/286/artificial_intelligence_and_cities_the_global_race_to_regulate_algorithms. Accessed 20 November 2024Gantzias G (2020) Dynamics of public interest in artificial intelligence: ‘Business intelligence culture’ and global regulation in the digital era. In: Park SH, Gonzalez-Perez MA, Floriani DE (eds) The Palgrave handbook of corporate sustainability in the digital era. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 259–281
Google Scholar
Gantzias G (2021) Governing by humans, not by robots: regulating humans and artificial intelligence in the 21st century. In: Christiansen B, Škrinjarić T (eds) Handbook of research on applied AI for international business and marketing applications. IGI Global, Pennsylvania, pp 116–134Chapter
Google Scholar
Garcia D (2016) Future arms, technologies, and international law: preventive security governance. EJIS 1:94–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2015.7Article
Google Scholar
Garcia D (2018) Lethal artificial intelligence and change: the future of international peace and security. Int Stud Rev 20:334–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy029Article
Google Scholar
Garcia EV (2021) Multilateralism and artificial intelligence: what role for the United Nations? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350193708_Multilateralism_and_Artificial_Intelligence_What_Role_for_the_United_Nations. Accessed 20 November 2024Gellers J (2020) Rights for robots: artificial intelligence, animal and environmental law. Routledge, AbingdonBook
Google Scholar
Gellers JC, Gunkel DJ (2023) Artificial Intelligence and international human rights law: implications for humans and technology in the 21st century and beyond. In: Zwitter A, Gstrein O (eds) Handbook on the politics and governance of big data and artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Google Scholar
George A, Walsh T (2022) Artificial intelligence is breaking patent law. Nature 605:616–618Article
ADS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gerke S, Minssen T, Cohen G (2020) Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare. Artif Intell Health Care. 295-336. 10.1016%2FB978-0-12-818438-7.00012-5Gervais DJ (2023) Towards an effective transnational regulation of AI. AI Soc 38:391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01310-0Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gesk TS, Leyer M (2022) Artificial Intelligence in public services: when and why citizens accept its usage. Gov Inf Q 39:101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101704Article
Google Scholar
Giannini A (2022) Artificial intelligence, ethics, law: a view on the Italian and American debate (and on their differences). NJLP 51:248–263. https://doi.org/10.5553/NJLP/221307132022051002002Article
Google Scholar
Gibbons ED (2021) Toward a more equal world: the human rights approach to extending the benefits of artificial intelligence. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 40(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3056295Article
Google Scholar
Gill AS (2019) Artificial intelligence and international security: the long view. Ethics Int Aff 33:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679419000145Article
Google Scholar
Goh HH, Vinuesa R (2021) Regulating artificial-intelligence applications to achieve the sustainable development goals. Discov Sustain 2:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00064-5Article
Google Scholar
Goitom H (2019) Ghana. In Regulation of artificial intelligence in selected jurisdictions. Law Library of Congress. https://irp.fas.org/eprint/lloc-ai.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2024Golbin I et al (2020) Responsible AI: a primer for the legal community. In Proceedings IEEE international conference on Big Data. 2121–2126Google (n.d.) Building a responsible regulatory framework for AIGov.UK (n.d.) International scientific report on the safety ofadvanced AI. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/international-scientific-report-on-the-safety-of-advanced-ai#:~:text=Future%20advances%20in%20general%2Dpurpose,could%20result%20in%20catastrophic%20outcomes. Accessed 20 November 2024Governatori G et al. (2022) Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the first decade. Artif Intell Law 30:481–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09329-4Article
Google Scholar
Greenstein S (2022) Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). Artif Intell Law 30:291–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4Article
Google Scholar
Guerreiro J, Rebelo S, Teles P (2023) Regulating artificial intelligence. https://jguerreiro.com/files/GRT_AIRegulation.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2024Gurkaynak G, Yilmaz I, Haksever G (2016) Stifling artificial intelligence: human perils. CLSR 32:749–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2016.05.003Article
Google Scholar
Gutierrez CI, Marchant G, Tournas L (2020) Lessons for artificial intelligence from historical uses of soft law governance. Jurismetrics 61:133–149
Google Scholar
Hacker P (2018) A manifesto on enforcing law in the age of ‘artificial intelligence’; teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law. Common Mark Law Rev 55:1143–1185. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2018095Article
Google Scholar
Hadfield GK, Clark J (2023) Regulatory markets: the future of AI governance. Artif Intell 1–29. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.04914Hadzovic S, Mrdovic S, Radonjic M (2023) A path towards an internet of things and artificial intelligence regulatory framework. IEEE Commun Mag 61:90–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.002.2200373Article
Google Scholar
Hakimi M (2020) Why should we care about international law? Mich Law Rev 118:1283–1306. https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.118.6.whyArticle
Google Scholar
Han TA, Pereira LM, Santos FC, Lenaerts T (2020) To regulate or not: a social dynamics analysis of an 27tandardi AI race. JAIR 69:881–921. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12225Article
Google Scholar
Han TA, Lenaerts T, Santos FC, Pereira LM (2022) Voluntary safety commitments provide an escape from over-regulation in AI development. Technol Soc. 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101843Haner J, Garcia D (2019) The artificial intelligence arms race: Trends and world leaders in autonomous weapons development. Glob Policy 10:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12713Article
Google Scholar
Hars A (2022) AI and international law—legal personality and avenues for regulation. Hung J Leg Stud 62:320–344. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2022.00352Article
Google Scholar
Hashiguchi M (2017) The global artificial intelligence revolution challenges patent eligibility laws. JBTL 13:1–35.
Google Scholar
HEC Paris Insights (2022) Regulating artificial intelligence—is global consensus possible? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/hecparis/2022/09/09/regulating-artificial-intelligence–is-global-consensus-possible/. Accessed 20 November 2024Herve A (2021) Data protection and artificial intelligence: the European Union’s internal approach and its promotion through trade agreements. In: Peng SY, Lin CF, Streinz T (eds) Artificial intelligence and international economic law: disruption, regulation and reconfiguration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 193–214Chapter
Google Scholar
Hickman E, Petrin M (2021) Trustworthy AI and corporate governance: The EU’s ethics guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence from a company law perspective. Eur Bus Organ Law Rev 22:593–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-021-00224-0Article
Google Scholar
Hillman J (2023) Smart regulation: Lessons from the artificial intelligence act. EILR 37:775–826.
Google Scholar
Hilton AD (2019) Artificial intelligence: the societal responsibility to inform, educate, and regulate. AI Matters 5:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362077.3362088Article
Google Scholar
Hoffman-Riem W (2020) Artificial intelligence as a challenge for law and regulation. In: Wischmeyer T, Rademacher T (eds) Regulating artificial intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–29Holitsche S (2023) How companies can contribute to the development of international law frameworks for AI regulation. Linkedin. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-companies-can-contribute-development-law-ai-stefan-holitschke/. Accessed 20 November 2024Hollis DB (2002) Private actors in public international law: Amicus curiae and the case for the retention of state sovereignty. Boston Coll Int Comp Law Rev 25:235
Google Scholar
How ML (2021) Artificial intelligence for social good in responsible global citizenship education: an inclusive democratized low-code approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd world conference on teaching and education, Vienna, AustriaHowse R, Teitel R (2010) Beyond compliance: rethinking why international law really matters? Glob Policy 1:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00035.xArticle
Google Scholar
Hua SS (2019) Machine learning weapons and international humanitarian law: rethinking meaningful human control. Georget J Int Law 51:117–146
Google Scholar
Huang K et al. (2024) AI regulations. In: Huang K, et al., eds Generative AI security: theories and practices. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 61–98Chapter
Google Scholar
Humble K (2023) Artificial intelligence, international law and the race for killer robots in modern warfare. In: Završnik A, Simončič Katja (eds) Artificial intelligence, social harms and human rights. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 57–76Chapter
Google Scholar
Hutson M (2023) Rules to keep AI in check: nations carve different paths for tech regulation. Accessed 20 November 2024Hwang T, Rosen L (2017) Harder, better, faster, stronger: international law and the future of online PsyOps. Com Prop Working Paper No.1. University of OxfordIBM (2023) AI alliance launches as an international community of leading technology developers, researchers, and adopters collaborating together to advance open, safe, responsible AI. https://newsroom.ibm.com/AI-Alliance-Launches-as-an-International-Community-of-Leading-Technology-Developers,-Researchers,-and-Adopters-Collaborating-Together-to-Advance-Open,-Safe,-Responsible-AI. Accessed 20 November 2024Isom P (2022) Earning citizen confidence through a comprehensive approach to responsible and trustworthy AI stewardship and governance. J AI Robot Workplace Autom 1:278–284Article
Google Scholar
Jablonowska A et al. (2018) Consumer law and artificial intelligence challenges to the EU consumer law and policy stemming from the business’ use of artificial intelligence. European University Institute Working paper. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/57484. Accessed 20 November 2024Jackson BW (2019) Artificial intelligence and the fog of innovation: a deep-dive on governance and the liability of autonomous systems. St Clara High Technol Law J 35:35–63.
Google Scholar
Jacobs G (2018) Cryptocurrencies & the challenge of global governance. Cadmus 3:109–123
Google Scholar
Jelinek T, Wallach W, Kerimi D (2021) Policy brief: the creation of a G20 coordinating committee for the governance of artificial intelligence. AI Ethics 1:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00019-yArticle
Google Scholar
Johnson WG, Bowman DM (2021) A survey of instruments and institutions available for the global governance of artificial intelligence. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 40:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3123745Article
Google Scholar
Johnson WG (2022) Flexible regulation for dynamic products? The case of applying principles-based regulation to medical products using artificial intelligence. Law Innov Technol 14:205–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2022.2113665Article
Google Scholar
Jones M (2022) Civil society and AI: striving for ethical governance. Alexander von Humboldt. https://www.hiig.de/en/civil-society-and-ai-striving-for-ethical-governance/. Accessed 20 November 2024Kachra AJ (2024) Making sense of China’s AI regulations. https://www.holisticai.com/blog/china-ai-regulation#:~:text=Drafted%20by%20the%20Cyberspace%20Administration,tags%20about%20their%20personal%20characteristics. Accessed 20 November 2024Kelly MJ, Moreno-Ocampo L (2016) Prosecuting corporations for genocide. Oxford University Press, OxfordBook
Google Scholar
Kerry CF et al. (2021) Strengthening international cooperation on AI. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Strengthening-International-Cooperation-AI_Oct21.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2024Khalaileh Y (2023) Accommodating artificial intelligence in international law: an overview and new frontier. JoHS 19:23–31. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2022.19010022Article
Google Scholar
Kingston J (2018) Artificial intelligence and legal liability. Cornell UniversityKinley D, Tadaki J (2004) From talk to walk: The emergence of human rights responsibilities for corporations at international law. Virginia J Int Law 44:931
Google Scholar
Kinley D, Chambers R (2006) The UN human rights norms for corporations: the private implications of public international law. Hum Rights Law Rev 6:447–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngl020Article
Google Scholar
Klabbers J (2013) International law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeBook
Google Scholar
Kleizen B, Van Dooren W, Verhoest K, Tan E (2023) Do citizens trust trustworthy artificial intelligence? Experimental evidence on the limits of ethical AI measures in government. Govern Inf Q 101834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101834Koniakou V (2023) From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in artificial intelligence. Inf Syst Front 25:71–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10300-6Article
Google Scholar
Konig PD (2023a) Citizen conceptions of democracy and support for artificial intelligence in government and politics. ECPR 62:1280–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12570Article
Google Scholar
Konig PD, Wurster S, Siewert MB (2023b) Sustainability challenges of artificial intelligence and Citizens’ regulatory preferences. Govern Inf Q https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101863Konstantinova Y, et al. (2020) State and civil society in the digital age: a search for methodological approaches. In Proceedings of the innovations in digital economy: second international scientific conference, SPBPU IDE 2020, St. Petersburg, Russia, October 22–23, 2020, revised selected papers 15:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3444465.3444511Korinek A, Stiglitz JE (2021) Artificial intelligence, globalization, and strategies for economic development. Centre for the Governance of AI. https://www.governance.ai/research-paper/artificial-intelligence-globalization-and-strategies-for-economic-development. Accessed 20 November 2024Krausová A (2017) Intersections between law and artificial intelligence. Int J Comput 27:55–68
Google Scholar
Kriebitz A, Lutge C (2020) Artificial intelligence and human rights: a business ethical assessment. Bus Hum Rights J 5:84–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2019.28Article
Google Scholar
Krisch N (2014) The decay of consent: International law in an age of global public goods. Am J Int Law 108:1–40. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.1.0001Article
Google Scholar
Lane L (2022) Clarifying human rights standards through artificial intelligence initiatives. Int Comp Law Q 71:915–944. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000380Article
Google Scholar
Lane L (2023) Artificial intelligence and human rights: corporate responsibility under international human rights law. In: Završnik A, Simončič K (eds) Artificial intelligence, social harms and human rights. Springer, Dordrecht, p 183–205Chapter
Google Scholar
Langford M (2020) Taming the digital leviathan: automated decision-making and international human rights. Am J Int Law 114:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2020.31Article
Google Scholar
Latonero M (2018) Governing artificial intelligence: upholding human rights & dignity. Data & Society. https://datasociety.net/library/governing-artificial-intelligence/. Accessed 20 November 2024Lee J (2022) Artificial intelligence and international law. Springer, DordrechtBook
Google Scholar
Lee R (2024) Global AI regulation efforts prompt US-China talks. Tech Informed. https://techinformed.com/global-ai-regulation-efforts-prompt-us-china-talks/. Accessed 20 November 2024Lerude B (2023) States take the lead on regulating artificial intelligence. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/states-take-lead-regulating-artificial-intelligence. Brennan Center for Justice. Accessed 20 November 2024Leslie D et al. (2021) Artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law—a primer. Council of Europe. https://edoc.coe.int/en/artificial-intelligence/10206-artificial-intelligence-human-rights-democracy-and-the-rule-of-law-a-primer.html. Accessed 20 November 2024Leslie D et al. (2024) ‘Frontier AI’, power, and the public interest: who benefits, who decides? Harvard Data Sci Rev. 1–20Lewis L (2019) Resolving the battle over artificial intelligence in war. RUSI J 164:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1694228Article
Google Scholar
Li C (2023) Global push to regulate artificial intelligence, plus other AI stories to read this month. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/05/top-story-plus-other-ai-stories-to-read-this-month/. Accessed 20 November 2024Lin TCW (2019) Artificial intelligence, finance, and the law. Fordham Law Rev 88:531–551.
Google Scholar
Lister MJ (2011) The legitimating role of consent in international law. Chin J Int Law 11:663–691.
Google Scholar
Liu HY (2018) The power structure of artificial intelligence. Law Innov Technol 10:197–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2018.1527480Article
Google Scholar
Liu HW et al. (2020a) Artificial intelligence and legal disruption: a new model for analysis. Law Innov Technol 12:205–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1815402Article
Google Scholar
Liu HW, Lin CF (2020b) Artificial intelligence and global trade governance: a pluralist agenda. Harv Int Law J 61:407–450
Google Scholar
Losifidis P (2016) Globalisation and the re-emergence of the regulatory state. In: Flew T, Petros L, Steemers J (eds.) Global media and national policies. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 16–31
Google Scholar
Lynn T et al. (2022) Digital towns: accelerating and measuring the digital transformation of rural societies and economies. Springer, DordrechtBook
Google Scholar
Maas M (2019a) International law does not compute: artificial intelligence and the development, displacement or destruction of the global legal order. Melb J Int Law 29:1–29
Google Scholar
Maas MM (2019b) Innovation-proof global governance for military artificial intelligence? How I learned to stop worrying, and love the bot. J Int Humanit Leg Stud 10:129–157. https://doi.org/10.1163/18781527-01001006Article
Google Scholar
Maggetti M, Di Mascio F, Natalini A (2022) Handbook of regulatory authorities. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Google Scholar
Marchant G (2019) Soft law governance of artificial intelligence. UCLA: The Program on Understanding Law, Science, and Evidence (PULSE)Marchant G (2021) Why soft law is the best way to approach the pacing problem in AI. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/media/article/why-soft-law-is-the-best-way-to-approach-the-pacing-problem-in-ai. Accessed 20 November 2024Marr B (2023) The 15 biggest risks of artificial intelligence. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/06/02/the-15-biggest-risks-of-artificial-intelligence/. Accessed 20 November 2024Martin AS, Freeland S (2021) The advent of artificial intelligence in space activities: new legal challenges. Space Policy 55:101408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2020.101408Article
Google Scholar
Martina L, Merenda F (2021) Artificial intelligence: a paradigm shift in international law and politics? Autonomous weapon systems as a case study. In: Giacomello G, Moro FN, Valigi M (eds) Technology and international relations: the new frontier in global power. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Google Scholar
Mavridis N, Quack E, Wussow K (2021) Leveraging artificial intelligence and digital tech to help citizens, societies, and economies survive and strive during pandemics. In: Gruenwald L, Jain S, Groppe S (eds) Leveraging artificial intelligence in global epidemics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 29–69Chapter
Google Scholar
Marwala T (2024) We need good governance to shape AI for good. UNU. https://unu.edu/article/we-need-good-governance-shape-ai-good. Accessed 20 November 2024Maxwell J, Tomlinson J (2020) Public law and technology: mapping and Analysing legal responses in UK civil society. Judic Rev 25:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2020.1732741Article
Google Scholar
McCaffrey SC (2019) The law of international watercourses. Oxford University Press, OxfordBook
Google Scholar
McCarty LT (2018) Finding the right balance in artificial intelligence and law. In: Barfield W, Pagallo U (eds) Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, p 55–87
Google Scholar
McGregor L (2018) Accountability for governance choices in artificial intelligence: Afterword to Eyal Benvenisti’s foreword. 29:1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy086McIntosh J (2020) Moving toward an artificial intelligence treaty. Michigan J Int Law Blog. https://www.mjilonline.org/moving-toward-an-artificial-intelligence-treaty/. Accessed 20 November 2024Medaglia R, Gil-Garcia R, Pardo TA (2021) Artificial intelligence in government: taking stock and moving forward. Soc Sci Comput Rev 41:123–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211034087Article
Google Scholar
Meltzer JP (2023) The US government should regulate AI if it wants to lead on international AI governance. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-us-government-should-regulate-ai/. Accessed 20 November 2024Miailhe N, Hodes C (2017) The third age of artificial intelligence. Field Actions Sci Rep: Artif Intell Robot City 17:6–11
Google Scholar
Miailhe N, Lannquist Y (2022) Global governance of artificial intelligence. In: Naqvi A, Munoz JM (eds) Handbook of artificial intelligence and robotic process automation policy and government applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 23–30
Google Scholar
Mishalchenko YV, Dovbush TN, Mishalchenko MY (2022) International legal and economic aspects of regulation of digital technologies and artificial intelligence. In: Rumyantseva A, et al., (eds) Challenges and solutions in the digital economy and finance. Springer, Dordrecht, p 29–36Chapter
Google Scholar
Mohammed O et al. (2022) Data4Good: an established framework for supporting civil society organizations. 2022 IEEE International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC), Ottawa, ON, Canada
Google Scholar
Murdoch B (2021) Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era. BMC Med Ethics 22:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3Article
Google Scholar
Musch S, Borrelli M, Kerrigan C (2023) The EU AI act as global artificial intelligence regulationNash L (2019) Advancing intelligence and global society: International law’s role in governing the advance of artificial intelligence. Ky Law J. Online. 108. https://perma.cc/I4-24CJNeuwirth RJ (2024) The global institutional governance of AI: a four-dimensional perspective. Int J Digit Law Gov 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0004Nindler R (2019) The United Nation’s capability to manage existential risks with a focus on artificial intelligence. Int Community Law Rev 21(1):5–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341388Article
Google Scholar
Norodom AT et al. (2023) White paper 16: digital challenges for international law. International Law AssociationPesapane F et al. (2021) Legal and regulatory framework for AI solutions in healthcare in EU, US, China, and Russia: new scenarios after a pandemic. Radiation 1:261–276. https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation1040022Article
Google Scholar
O’Brien R (2005) Global civil society and global governance. In: Ba AD, Hoffman MJ (eds) Contending perspectives on global governance: coherence and contestation. Routledge, Abingdon
Google Scholar
O’Halloran S, Nowaczyk N (2019) An Artificial intelligence approach to regulating systemic risk. Front Artif Intell 2:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2019.00007Article
Google Scholar
Oprea O, Hoinaru R, Pacuraru-Lonescu CP, Neamtu D (2022) Accounting for the future: practice, Artificial Intelligence and regulation. Sciendo. 817–826. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0076Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019) Recommendation of the Council on artificial intelligence. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/api/print?ids=648&lang=en. Accessed 20 November 2024Ovink C (2024) AI risks for international peace and security. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/ai-risks-for-international-peace-and-security. Accessed 20 November 2024Ozdan S (2023) Don’t leave artificial intelligence alone: It could hurt human rights. In: Jandric P, et al., (eds) Constructing postdigital research: method and rmancipation. Springer, Dordrecht
Google Scholar
Packin NG, Aretz YL (2018) Learning algorithms and discrimination. In: Barfield W, Pagallo U (eds) Research handbook of law and AI. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Google Scholar
Pagallo U, Casanovas P, Madelin R (2019) The middle-out approach: assessing models of legal governance in data protection, artificial intelligence, and the web of data. TPLeg 7:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2019.1664543Article
Google Scholar
Pagallo U, Bassi E, Durante M (2023) The normative challenges of AI in outer space: law, ethics, and the realignment of terrestrial standards. Philos Technol 36:23–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00626-7Article
Google Scholar
Paliwala A (2016) Rediscovering artificial intelligence and law: An inadequate jurisprudence? Law Innov Technol 30:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2016.1229651Article
Google Scholar
Papyshev G, Yarime M (2022) The limitation of ethics-based approaches to regulating artificial intelligence: regulatory gifting in the context of Russia. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01611-yPayne K (2018) Artificial intelligence: a revolution in strategic affairs? Survival 60:7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2018.1518374Article
Google Scholar
Peel J (2012) Climate change law: the emergence of a new legal discipline. Melb Univ Law Rev 32:922–979
Google Scholar
Peng SY, Lin CF, Streinz T (2021) Artificial intelligence and international economic law: disruption, regulation and reconfiguration. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeBook
Google Scholar
Piccone T (2018) How can international law regulate autonomous weapons? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-can-international-law-regulate-autonomous-weapons/. Accessed 20 November 2024Pickering H (2014) Why do states mostly obey international law? E-Int Relat. https://www.e-ir.info/2014/02/04/why-do-states-mostly-obey-international-law/#:~:text=Essentially%2C%20states%20calculate%20their%20interests,states%20are%20likely%20to%20comply. Accessed 20 November 2024Poesen M (2022) Regulating artificial intelligence (AI) in the European Union (EU): Exploring the role of privateinternational law. In Boruchi C et al (eds) Recht in Beweging: 29ste VRG – Alumnidag 2022. Gompel & Svacina, Antwerp, pp 297–314Powers ST et al. (2023) The stuff we swim in: regulation alone will not lead to justifiable trust in AI. Technol Soc Mag 42(4):94–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2023.3341463Article
Google Scholar
Qerimi Q, Sergi BS (2022) The case for global regulation of carbon capture and storage and artificial intelligence for climate change. Int J Greenh Gas Control 120:103757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103757Article
Google Scholar
Radu R (2021) Steering the governance of artificial intelligence: national strategies in perspective. Policy Soc 40:178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1929728Article
Google Scholar
Rai R, Murali SA (2020) Global standards on artificial intelligence: a report on global legislation & policy positions governing AI technology. INDIai. https://indiaai.gov.in/documents/pdf/global-standards-on-ai-report.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2024Ratcliff CJ (2023) Who will write the rules for AI? How nations are racing to regulate artificial intelligence. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/who-will-write-the-rules-for-ai-how-nations-are-racing-to-regulate-artificial-intelligence-216900. Accessed 20 November 2024Rissland EL, Ashley KD, Loui RP (2003) AI and law: a fruitful synergy. Artif Intell 150:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00122-XArticle
Google Scholar
Roberts H et al. (2021) The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI Soc 36:59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2Article
Google Scholar
Robinson SC (2020) Trust, transparency, and openness: how inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI). 63: 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101421Roumate F (2021) Artificial intelligence, ethics and international human rights law. IRIE 29:1–10Article
Google Scholar
Said G et al. (2023) Adapting legal systems to the development of artificial intelligence: solving the global problem of AI in judicial processes. Int J Cyber Law 1:1–17. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijcl.49Article
Google Scholar
Saidakhrarovich GS, Sokhibjonovich BS (2022) Strategies and future prospects of development of artificial intelligence: world experience. World Bull Manag Law 9:66–74.
Google Scholar
Salgado-Criado J, Fernandez-Aller C (2021) A wide human-rights approach to artificial intelligence regulation in Europe. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 40:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2021.3056284Article
Google Scholar
Sari O, Celik S (2021) Legal evaluation of the attacks caused by artificial intelligence-based lethal weapon systems within the context of Rome statute. Comput Law Secur Rev 42:105564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105564Article
Google Scholar
Sartor et al. (2022) Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the second decade. Artif Intell Law 30:521–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09326-7Article
Google Scholar
Saura JR, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Palacios-Marques D (2022) Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment. Govern Info Q 39:101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101679Article
Google Scholar
Savaget P, Chiarini T, Evans S (2019) Empowering political participation through artificial intelligence. Sci Public Policy 46:369–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy064Article
Google Scholar
Schiff D (2020) What’s next for AI ethics, policy, and governance? A global overview. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society 20:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375804Schmitt L (2022) Mapping global AI governance: a nascent regime in a fragmented landscape. AI Ethics 2:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00083-yArticle
Google Scholar
Schwamborn M (2023) The “responsibility to and for progress” in international law. Volkerrechtsblog. https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/the-responsibility-to-and-for-progress-in-international-law/. Accessed 20 November 2024Schwalbe N, Wahl B (2020) Artificial intelligence and the future of global health. Lancet 395:1579–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30226-9Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schwarz EC (2019) Human vs. machine: a framework of responsibilities and duties of transnational corporations for respecting human rights in the use of artificial intelligence. Colum J Transnatl Law 58:232
Google Scholar
Shang KK, Du RR (2021) Disciplining artificial intelligence policies: world trade organization law as a sword and a shield. In Artificial intelligence and international economic law: disruption, regulation, and reconfiguration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 274–292Sharma GD, Yadav A, Chopra R (2020) Artificial intelligence and effective governance: a review, critique and research agenda. Sustain Futures 2:100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2019.100004Article
Google Scholar
Sharma S (2024) Benefits or concerns of AI: a multistakeholder responsibility. Futures 157:1–10Article
Google Scholar
Sepasspour R (2023) A reality check and a way forward for the global governance of artificial intelligence. Bull Sci 79:304–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2245249Article
Google Scholar
Smuha NA (2021) From a ‘race to AI’ to a ‘race to AI regulation’: regulatory competition for artificial intelligence. Law Innov Technol 13:57–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898300Article
Google Scholar
Smuha NA (2023) Biden, Bletchley, and the emerging international law of AI. Verfassungsblog. https://verfassungsblog.de/biden-bletchley-and-the-emerging-international-law-of-ai/. Accessed 20 November 2024Sohn LB (1983) The new international law: protection of the rights of individuals rather than states. Am Univ Law Rev 32:1
Google Scholar
Soyer B, Tettenborn A (2021) Artificial intelligence and autonomous shipping: developing the international legal framework. Hart Publishing, OxfordBook
Google Scholar
Stahl BC et al. (2021) Artificial intelligence for human flourishing—beyond principles for machine learning. J Bus Res 124:374–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.030Article
Google Scholar
Stahl BC et al. (2022) A European agency for artificial intelligence: protecting fundamental rights and ethical values. Comput Law Secur Rev 45:105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105661Article
Google Scholar
Starke C, Lunich M (2020) Artificial intelligence for political decision-making in the European Union: effects on citizens’ perceptions of input, throughput, and output legitimacy. Data Policy 2:e16-1–e16-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2020.19Article
Google Scholar
Sullivan M (2023) Global AI regulation: a closer look at the US, EU, and China. https://transcend.io/blog/ai-regulation#united-states. Accessed 20 November 2024Strous L (2019) Should artificial intelligence be more regulated? In: Strous L, Cerf VG (eds) Internet of things. Information processing in an increasingly connected world. Springer, Dordrecht, p 28–34Chapter
Google Scholar
Stuurman K, Lachoud E (2022) Regulating AI. A label to complete the proposed Act on Artificial Intelligence. Comput Law Secur Rev 44:105657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105657Article
Google Scholar
Strange M, Tucker J (2023) Global governance and the normalization of artificial intelligence as ‘good’ for human health. AI Soc. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01774-2Sundberg L (2023) Towards the digital risk society: a review. Hum Aff 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2023-0057Surden H (2019) Artificial intelligence and law: an overview. GA State Univ Law Rev 35:1305–1337.
Google Scholar
Taddeo M et al. (2021) Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in national defence. Philos Technol 34:1707–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00482-3Article
Google Scholar
Tallberg et al. (2023) The global governance of artificial intelligence: next steps for empirical and normative research. Rev Int Stud 25:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad040Article
Google Scholar
Taeihagh A (2021) Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy Soc 40:137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377Article
Google Scholar
Talimonchik VP (2021a) The prospects for creating instruments for the coordination of activities of international organizations in the regulation of artificial intelligence. In: Osaba E, et al., (eds) Artificial intelligence: latest advances, new paradigms and novel applications. InTech Open, London
Google Scholar
Talimonchik VP (2021b) The prospects for the recognition of the international legal personality of artificial intelligence. Laws 10:85. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10040085Article
Google Scholar
The Editors of the EAPIL (2021) The EU’s upcoming regulatory framework on artificial intelligence and its Impact on PIL. EAPIL. https://eapil.org/2021/07/12/the-eus-upcoming-regulatory-framework-on-artificial-intelligence-and-its-impact-on-pil/. Accessed 20 November 2024The Future Society (n.d.) The Athens Roundtable. https://thefuturesociety.org/workstream/the-athens-roundtable-on-ai-and-the-rule-of-law/. Accessed 20 November 2024Thomson Reuters (2023) Can AI companies still move fast and break things despite pending regulations? https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/government/ai-pending-regulations/. Accessed 20 November 2024Tinnirello M (2022) The global politics of artificial intelligence. Routledge, AbingdonBook
Google Scholar
Toth Z, Caruana R, Gruber T, Loebbecke C (2022) The dawn of the AI robots: towards a new framework of AI robot accountability. J Bus Ethics 178:895–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05050-zArticle
Google Scholar
Trager T et al (2023) International governance of civilian AI: a jurisdictional certification approach. 1–51Truby J, Brown R, Dahdal A (2020) Banking on AI: mandating a proactive approach to AI regulation in the financial sector. Law Financ Mark Rev 14:110–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2020.1760454Article
Google Scholar
Turchin A, Denkenberger D (2020) Classification of global catastrophic risks connected with artificial intelligence. AI Soc 35:147–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0845-5Article
Google Scholar
Turk V (2023) Artificial intelligence must be grounded in human rights, says High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2023/07/artificial-intelligence-must-be-grounded-human-rights-says-high-commissionerTurner J (2019) Robot rules: regulating artificial intelligence. Springer, DordrechtBook
Google Scholar
Tzimas T (2018) Artificial intelligence as global commons and the “international law supremacy” principle. In: Striełkowski W, et al., (eds) Advances in social science, education and humanities research. Atlantis. Press, Dordrecht
Google Scholar
Tzimas T (2021) Legal and ethical challenges of artificial intelligence from an international law perspective. Springer, DordrechtBook
Google Scholar
United Nations (n.d.a) Secretary-General’s report “Our Common Agenda”. https://www.un.org/en/content/common-agenda-report/. Accessed 20 November 2024United Nations (n.d.b) Global digital compact. https://www.un.org/techenvoy/global-digital-compact. Accessed 20 November 2024United Nations (2023a) Interim report: governing AI for humanity. Published by advisory body on artificial intelligence. Accessed 20 November 2024United Nations (2023b) International community must urgently confront new reality of generative, artificial intelligence, speakers stress as security council debates risks, rewards. https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15359.doc.htm. 20 November 2024United Nations (2024) The summit of the future in 2024. https://www.un.org/en/common-agenda/summit-of-the-future. Accessed 20 November 2024United Nations General Assembly (2024) Resolution 78/265. Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development. A/RES/78/265United Nations Human Rights Council (n.d.) Universal periodic review. https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/upr/upr-home. Accessed 20 November 2024United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2021) Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence?United States Department of State (2023) Artificial intelligence for accelerating progress on the sustainable development goals: Addressing society’s greatest challenges. https://www.state.gov/artificial-intelligence-for-accelerating-progress-on-the-sustainable-development-goals-addressing-societys-greatest-challenges/. Accessed 20 November 2024Usman H, Nawaz B, Naseer S. (n.d.) The future of state sovereignty in the age of artificial intelligence. J Law Soc Stud. 5:142–152. https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.05.02.142152Valle-Cruz D et al. (2020) Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: from agenda-setting to policy evaluation. Govern Inf Q 37:101509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101509Article
Google Scholar
Van Aaken A, Simsek B (2021) Rewarding in international law. Am J Int Law 115:195–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2021.2Article
Google Scholar
Van Benthem T (2021) The regulation standardizased artificial intelligence: protecting civilians through legal reviews of new weapons and precautions. In: Bielicki DM (ed) Regulating artificial intelligence in industry. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamVan Dijk N, Casiraghi S, Gutwirth S (2021) The ‘ethification’ of ICT governance. Artificial intelligence and data protection in the European Union. Comput Law Secur Rev 43:105597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597Article
Google Scholar
Vazquez CM (2005) Direct vs. Indirect obligations of corporations under international law. Colum J Transnatl L 43:927–959.
Google Scholar
Veale M, Matus K, Gorwa R (2023) AI and global governance: modalities, rationales, tensions. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 19:255–275. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020223-040749Article
Google Scholar
Velasco C (2022) Cybercrime and artificial intelligence. An overview of the work of international organizations on criminal justice and the international applicable instruments. ERA Forum 23:109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-022-00702-zArticle
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Vihul L (2020) International legal regulation of autonomous technologies. Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/international-legal-regulation-autonomous-technologies/. Accessed 20 November 2024Villarino JMB, Vijeyarasa R (2022) International human rights, artificial intelligence, and the challenge for the pondering state: time to regulate? Nord J Hum Rights 40:194–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2069919Article
Google Scholar
Villarino JMB (2023a) Global standard-setting for artificial intelligence: para-regulating international law for AI? Aust Yearb Int Law 41:157–181. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660229-04101018Article
Google Scholar
Villarino JMB et al. (2023b) Standardisation, trust and democratic principles: the global race to regulate artificial intelligence. United States Studies Centre. Accessed 20 November 2024 https://ussc.edu.au/standardisation-trust-and-democratic-principles-the-global-race-to-regulate-artificial-intelligenceVillaronga EF, Kieseberg P, Li T (2018) Humans forget, machines remember: artificial intelligence and the right to Be forgotten. Comput Law Secur Rev 34:304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.08.007Article
Google Scholar
Villasenor J (2020) Soft law as a complement to AI regulation. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/soft-law-as-a-complement-to-ai-regulation/. Accessed 20 November 2024Villata S et al. (2022) Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the third decade. Artif Intell Law 30:561–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09327-6Article
Google Scholar
Vinuesa R et al. (2020) The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Commun 11:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-yArticle
Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy A, Goldmann M, Venzke I (2017) From public international to international public law: translating world public opinion into international public authority. Eur J Int Law 28:115–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx002Article
Google Scholar
Von Ingersleben-Seip N (2023) Competition and cooperation in artificial intelligence standard setting: explaining emergent patterns. Rev Policy Res 40:781–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12538Walker-Osborn C, Chan C (2017) Artificial intelligence and the law. ITNOW 59:36–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/itnow/bwx017Article
Google Scholar
Wallach W, Marchant GE (2018) An agile ethical/legal model for the International and national governance of AI and robotics. Proc IEEE 107:505–508. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2899422Article
Google Scholar
Walz A, Firth-Butterfield K (2019) Implementing ethics into artificial intelligence: a contribution, from a legal perspective, to the development of an AI governance regime. Duke Law Technol Rev 18:176–231.
Google Scholar
Wang C, Teo TSH, Janssen M (2021) Public and private value creation using artificial intelligence: an empirical study of AI voice robot users in Chinese public sector. Int J Inf Manag 61:102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102401Article
Google Scholar
Wang Y (2024) Do not go gentle into that good night: the European Union’s and China’s different approaches to the extraterritorial application of artificial intelligence laws and regulations. Comput Law Secur Rev 53:1–13Article
Google Scholar
Weber RH (2021) Artificial intelligence ante portas: reactions of law. J 4:486–499. https://doi.org/10.3390/j4030037Article
Google Scholar
Weiss EB (2011) International law in the kaleidoscopic world. Am J Int Law 1:21–32White & Case LLP (2024) AI watch: Global regulatory tracker – United States. https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/ai-watch-global-regulatory-tracker-united-states#:~:text=As%20noted%20above%2C%20there%20is,Responsible%20innovation%20and%20development. Accessed 20 November 2024Whyman B (2023) AI regulation is coming—what is the likely outcome? Center for Strategic & International Studies. https://www.csis.org/blogs/strategic-technologies-blog/ai-regulation-coming-what-likely-outcome. Accessed 20 November 2024Williams KC (2018) Intersections of technology and civil society. Knowledge, evidence and learning for developmentWinter E (2022) The compatibility of autonomous weapons with the principles of international humanitarian law. J Confl Secur Law 27:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krac001https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/14252/448_Intersections_of_Technology_and_Civil_Society.pdf?sequence=39&isAllowed=y. Accessed 20 November 2024Wirtz BW, Weyerer JC, Geyer C (2019) Artificial intelligence and the public sector—applications and challenges. Int J Public Adm 42:596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103Article
Google Scholar
Wirtz BW, Weyerer JC, Sturm BJ (2020) The dark sides of artificial intelligence: an integrated AI governance framework for public administration. Int J Public Adm 43:818–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1749851Article
Google Scholar
Wischmeyer T, Rademacher T (2020) Regulating artificial intelligence. Springer, DordrechtBook
Google Scholar
Wodecki B (2023) Top European companies: ‘Serious concerns’ about EU AI act. AI Bus. https://aibusiness.com/nlp/top-european-companies-serious-concerns-about-eu-ai-act. Accessed 20 November 2024Woodcock T (2021) Artificial intelligence: is the answer more law? Asser Institute. https://www.asser.nl/about-the-asser-institute/news/blog-artificial-intelligence-is-the-answer-more-law/. Accessed 20 November 2024World Health Organization (2021) Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200. Accessed 20 November 2024World Health Organization (2023) WHO outlines considerations for regulation of artificial intelligence for health. https://www.who.int/news/item/19-10-2023-who-outlines-considerations-for-regulation-of-artificial-intelligence-for-health. Accessed 20 November 2024Wright N (2018) How artificial intelligence will reshape the global order. Foreign Aff. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2018-07-10/how-artificial-intelligence-will-reshape-global-order. Accessed 20 November 2024Wu W, Liu S (2023) The need for a global standard of artificial intelligence regulation. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCAS computers and society. 52Yara O, Brazheyev A, Golovko L, Bashkatova V (2021a) Legal regulation of the use of Artificial Intelligence: problems and development prospects. Eur J Sustain Dev 10:281–289. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p281Article
Google Scholar
Yigitcanlar T (2020) Artificial intelligence technologies and related urban planning and development concepts: how are they perceived and utilized in Australia? J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex 6:187. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040187Article
Google Scholar
Yudi P, Berlian B (2023) The development of international law in the age of globalization: challenges and opportunities. Int J Soc Serv Res 3:2004–2008. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i8.491Article
Google Scholar
Yusuf AA (2020) Engaging with international law. Int Comp Law Q 69:505–519. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589320000172Article
Google Scholar
Zeng J (2020) Artificial intelligence and China’s authoritarian governance. Int Aff 96:1441–1459. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa172Article
Google Scholar
Zekos GI (2021) Economics and law of artificial intelligence: finance, economic impacts, risk management and governance. Springer, DordrechtBook
Google Scholar
Zhang B et al. (2021) Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence: evidence from a survey of machine learning researchers. J Artif Intell Res 71:591–666Article
ADS
Google Scholar
Zuiderwijk A, Chen YC, Salem F (2021) Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: a systematic literature review and a research agenda. Govern Inf Q 38:101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577Article
Google Scholar
IntelliPrompt curated this article: Read the full story at the original source by clicking here